The Kozhikode Sessions Court is set to deliver its verdict today on the SIT's petition to cancel the bail of DYFI leader Jithin Bhaskar, while also ruling on an anticipatory bail plea filed by fellow leader Ribesh Ramakrishnan.
Key Takeaways
- Kozhikode Sessions Court to rule on bail cancellation today
- DYFI leader Ribesh Ramakrishnan's anticipatory bail also on the docket
- 'Kafir screenshot' controversy continues to inflame Kerala's political climate
The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Vadakara is expected to issue its order on Friday regarding a petition filed by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) seeking the cancellation of bail granted to Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI) leader Jithin Bhaskar in the widely publicised ‘kafir screenshot’ case.
Background and Genesis of the Controversy
During the 2025 Lok Sabha election campaign in Vadakara, a fabricated screenshot went viral, portraying Congress candidate Shafi Parambil as a devout Muslim and CPI(M) candidate K.K. Shailaja as a ‘kafir’ (non‑believer). The post was falsely attributed to Muslim Youth League worker Mohammed Kasim, igniting religious sensitivities and turning the election atmosphere volatile.
Investigation Findings and Charges
According to the SIT, Bhaskar, a former member of the DYFI Vadakara Block Committee and the CPI(M) Thuruthi local committee, allegedly disseminated the contentious screenshot to roughly 200 recipients via WhatsApp’s broadcast feature and attempted to erase all related digital evidence. Forensic analysis recovered supporting data from the district forensic division.
The SIT also established that fellow DYFI leader Ribesh Ramakrishnan circulated the same screenshot through a WhatsApp group titled ‘Vadakara Squad’, which subsequently propagated to multiple other groups, amplifying the reach of the incendiary content.
Legal Arguments and Potential Outcomes
Prosecution argues that Bhaskar violated the conditions of his bail by posting Facebook messages that challenged the investigating team and sought to stir public unrest, thereby interfering with the investigation. Should the court uphold the SIT’s request, Bhaskar could face immediate detention, setting a precedent for stringent penalties against political actors who misuse digital platforms.
Simultaneously, the Kozhikode Sessions Court will decide on the anticipatory bail plea filed by Ramakrishnan, determining whether he too will be subjected to custodial measures or granted protective bail pending trial.
Implications for Kerala’s Political Landscape
This case underscores the volatile intersection of religion, social media, and electoral politics in Kerala. A decisive ruling against the accused could serve as a deterrent against the spread of misinformation in future campaigns, urging political parties to adopt more responsible digital communication strategies.